Microreactor and method for preparing a radiolabeled complex or a biomolecule conjugate

ABSTRACT

A microreactor for preparing a radiolabeled complex or a biomolecule conjugate comprises a microchannel for fluid flow, where the microchannel comprises a mixing portion comprising one or more passive mixing elements, and a reservoir for incubating a mixed fluid. The reservoir is in fluid communication with the microchannel and is disposed downstream of the mixing portion. A method of preparing a radiolabeled complex includes flowing a radiometal solution comprising a metallic radionuclide through a downstream mixing portion of a microchannel, where the downstream mixing portion includes one or more passive mixing elements, and flowing a ligand solution comprising a bifunctional chelator through the downstream mixing portion. The ligand solution and the radiometal solution are passively mixed while in the downstream mixing portion to initiate a chelation reaction between the metallic radionuclide and the bifunctional chelator. The chelation reaction is completed to form a radiolabeled complex.

RELATED APPLICATION

The present patent document is a division of U.S. Nonprovisional patentapplication Ser. No. 13/818,569, filed on May 13, 2013, which is thenational stage of International Application No. PCT/US2011/049057, filedon Aug. 25, 2011, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C.119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/377,364, filedon Aug. 26, 2010, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference intheir entirety.

FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

This invention was made with government support under grant numberDE-FG02-08ER64682 from the Department of Energy Office of Biological andEnvironmental Research and under grant number R24 CA86307 from theNational Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in thisinvention.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure is directed generally to microfluidics technologymore particularly to a microfluidic reactor and method for synthesizingradiometal-labeled imaging and therapeutic agents used in nuclearmedicine.

BACKGROUND

Nuclear imaging and therapy are vital to several areas of modernmedicine, including oncology, cardiology, hematology, and studies of thebiodistribution of drugs. These non-invasive techniques rely on theintroduction of radioactive agents (radiopharmaceuticals) into the bodyto detect disease via Positron Emission Tomography (PET) or SinglePhoton Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT), or to treat disease withionizing radiation. To minimize the systemic exposure of the body toradiation, and to enhance the specificity and sensitivity of the PET andSPECT imaging techniques, metallic radionuclides (radiometals) are boundto biomolecules (BMs) with bi-functional chelators (BFCs). The BM (e.g.,a peptide or an antibody) is selected to have a high affinity for thetissue of interest, to deliver and retain radiation only where it isneeded. The BFC is selected to have a high affinity for the radiometal,form a complex with the radiometal that is highly stable in vivo, andpossess a functional group that can form a bond with the biomolecule.

Two radionuclides commonly used in nuclear imaging are the positronemitter ¹⁸F (used in PET), and the gamma ray emitter ^(99m)Tc (used inSPECT). These radionuclides have relatively short half-lives (109minutes and 6 hours, respectively) that make them favorable forminimizing exposure of the body to radiation, and have decaycharacteristics that make them optimal for their respective imagingmodalities. However, focusing on PET imaging, the relatively shorthalf-life of ¹⁸F and its typical labeling conditions (use of organicsolvents) lowers its suitability for use with biomolecules such asantibodies. An alternative radionuclide that has received increasingattention is the positron emitter ⁶⁴Cu²⁺. The decay properties of thisradiometal allow it to be used both as a PET imaging agent and as anuclear therapy agent. In addition, its half-life of 12.7 hours and thecapability of cyclotron-based production of large quantities with highspecific activity (>10,000 mCi/mol) from enriched ⁶⁴Ni³ facilitate thedistribution of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ from a central production facility. Furtherbenefits associated with ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ include: (1) its well-documentedcoordination chemistry, redox chemistry, and biochemistry and metabolismin humans, (2) the availability of a variety of azamacrocyclic BFCs thatcan chelate copper in the 2+ oxidation state with high specificity andstability, and (3) the ability to perform radiolabeling reactions inprotein-friendly, aqueous media (as opposed to the organic solventsrequired for radiolabeling with ¹⁸F), at pH ˜7, and atnear-physiological temperatures.⁹

Conventional radiolabeling methods for ⁶⁴Cu²⁺, and other radiometals,typically require the dilution of small quantities (1-2 mCi≈4 picomolesof ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ in ˜10 μL is diluted to ˜500 μL) for convenient handling andproper mixing, resulting in nanomolar concentrations of the radiometal.This dilution requires a large excess (˜100-fold) of the potentiallyexpensive and difficult-to-obtain BFC-BM conjugate to ensure the desiredhigh percentage of bound radionuclide (>90%) within a reasonable time(<1 hour). In turn, the use of large excesses of BFC-BM conjugatenecessitates extensive chromatographic purification to remove unlabeledBFC-BMs and to obtain the high specific activities that are desirablefor application of the radiopharmaceutical, for example in PET imaging.Chromatographic purification is also potentially required to removeBFC-BM impurities that may bind more strongly or more quickly to theradiometal than the desired BFC-BM conjugate. For instance, if the100-fold excess of BFC-BM contains 1% impurity, then the molar ratio ofimpurity to radiometal would be 1:1, potentially leading to thesynthesis of unwanted radiometal-ligand complex.

BRIEF SUMMARY

In view of the shortcomings of conventional techniques, the presentinventors have developed an improved method and microreactor forproducing a radiolabeled complex that may be used as an imaging agent ortherapeutic complex in nuclear medicine. The microreactor may also beused to synthesize biomolecule conjugates.

The method includes, according to one aspect, flowing a radiometalsolution comprising a metallic radionuclide through a downstream mixingportion of a microchannel, where the downstream mixing portion includesone or more passive mixing elements, and flowing a ligand solutioncomprising a bifunctional chelator, which may be bound to a biomolecule,through the downstream mixing portion. The ligand solution and theradiometal solution are passively mixed while in the downstream mixingportion, and a chelation reaction between the metallic radionuclide andthe bifunctional chelator is initiated. The chelation reaction iscompleted to form a radiolabeled complex.

The method includes, according to another aspect, flowing a chelatorsolution and a biomolecule solution through a mixing portion of amicrochannel, where the mixing portion includes one or more passivemixing elements, and passively mixing the chelator solution and thebiomolecule solution to form a combined solution via a conjugationreaction. A biomolecule conjugate is thereby synthesized.

The microreactor for preparing a radiolabeled complex or a biomoleculeconjugate comprises a microchannel for fluid flow, where themicrochannel comprises a mixing portion comprising one or more passivemixing elements, and a reservoir for incubating a mixed fluid. Thereservoir is in fluid communication with the microchannel and isdisposed downstream of the mixing portion.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows (a) a photograph, and (b) a schematic diagram of anexemplary microreactor where the mixing channels and incubationreservoirs are filled with dye (FIG. 1( a)). In both (a) and (b), 1 isthe radiometal inlet, 2 is the buffer inlet, 3 is the serpentine mixingmicrochannel, 4 is the BFC-BM inlet, 5 are the incubation reservoirs,and 6 is the product outlet. In (b), 3 a and 3 b are the first andsecond portions of the microchannel, respectively. The inset in (b)shows an illustration of staggered herringbone grooves defined in thePDMS ceiling of the mixing microchannel. The length, width, and heightof the PDMS portion of the exemplary microreactor are ˜2″×˜1.5″×˜0.25″.Of course other dimensions are also possible.

FIGS. 2( a)-2(b) show (a) flow profile in an exemplary hexagonalreservoir and (b) flow profile in an exemplary reservoir with athree-channel manifold. In (a) and (b), the approximate flow profile isindicated with a dashed white line, and the arrows indicate thedirection of flow. In (a), slow-moving liquid at the edge of thereservoir has a higher residence time than fast-moving liquid at thecenter of the reservoir. Additional liquid may be injected to fullyflush out the contents of the reservoir. This additional liquid resultsin dilution of the contents of the reservoir. Furthermore, additionalelongation of the flow profile can be seen in the triangular sectionnear the outlet. In (b), the flow profile is significantly flatter,providing a more uniform residence time across the width of thereservoir. Less additional liquid may be injected to fully flush out thecontents of the reservoir, resulting in less dilution. In this example,the ratio of the width of the outer exit channels (labeled 1 in FIG. 2(b) to the central exit channel (labeled 2 in FIG. 2( b)) is 4:1.

FIG. 3( a) illustrates the reaction scheme of the chelation of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ byDOTA-cyclo(RGDfK). Of the four pendant arms of DOTA, two are used inchelation of the radiometal and one is used to conjugate the biomoleculecyclo(RGDfK).

FIG. 3( b) shows the structure of cyclo(RGDfK) and the position at whichDOTA is conjugated to the biomolecule.

FIG. 4 shows a schematic diagram of an exemplary radiolabeling system.Three LabVIEW-controlled syringe pumps drive the flow of the BFC-BM(ligand), buffer, radiometal solutions into the microreactor. Athin-film heater, controlled using a temperature controller and aresistance temperature detector (RTD) probe affixed to the heater, setsthe incubation temperature. Lead shielding surround the microreactor andradiometal pump when operating with radioactive reagents.

FIGS. 5( a)-5(b) show radiolabeling yield for the production of⁶⁴Cu-DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) as a function of (a) residence time, t_(RES), and(b) radiolabeling method at various temperatures, T. In (a), error barsrepresent standard deviation in the extent of reaction for experimentsusing radiometal solutions made from the same batch of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ fort_(RES)=7 and 22 minutes (n=3) and between experiments using radiometalsolutions made from three different batches of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ for t_(RES)=12minutes (3 repetitions for each batch, n=9). Experiments were performedat T=37° C. Lines between points are guides for the eye. In (b), for the‘Microreactor’ method, error bars represent the standard deviation inextent of reaction between three experiments using radiometal solutionsmade from two (T=23 and 47° C., n=6) and three (T=37° C., n=9) differentbatches of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺. For the other two methods, error bars represent thestandard deviation in extent of reaction between three experiments usingradiometal solutions made from the same batch of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ (n=3).Experiments were performed with t_(RES)=12 minutes. All experiments wereperformed using a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ toDOTA-cyclo(RGDfK).

FIG. 6 shows radiolabeling yield as a function of the finalconcentration of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺, M_(F), using a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio of⁶⁴Cu²⁺ to DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK). Error bars represent standard deviation inthe extent of reaction for three experiments (t_(RES)=12 minutes, T=37°C.), using radiometal solutions made from the same batch of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺.Lines between points are guides for the eye.

FIG. 7 shows retention of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ in an exemplary PDMS/glass microchannelwith staggered herringbone grooves. The retention measured withoutblocking the surface of the microchannel using non-radioactive Cu²⁺(white bars) is compared to the retention measured after blocking thesurface of the microchannel using non-radioactive Cu²⁺ (grey bars).Error bars represent the standard deviations of the averages of multipleexperiments (n=1 for no Cu²⁺ pre-treatment, n=2 for Cu²⁺ pre-treatment).

FIG. 8 shows retention of ⁶⁸Ga³⁺ in an exemplary PDMS/glass microchannelwith staggered herringbone grooves. The retention measured withoutblocking the surface of the microchannel using non-radioactive Ga³⁺(darker bars) is compared to the retention measured after blocking thesurface of the microchannel using non-radioactive Ga³⁺ (paler bars).

FIGS. 9( a) and 9(b) show (a) the biomolecule RGD used for imagingtumors; and (b) radiolabeling schemes tested.

FIG. 10 shows a comparison of radiolabeling efficiencies for threedifferent systems at three different temperatures.

FIGS. 11( a) and 11(b) show the effect of (a) radiometal concentrationand (b) reaction or residence time on radiolabeling efficiency for thethree schemes; labeling was performed on-chip.

FIG. 12 provides a comparison of radiolabeling efficiencies for labelingbovine serum albumin (BSA).

FIG. 13 shows a Cu(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne [3+2] cyclo-additionreaction used to conjugate targeting biomolecules (BM) withbi-functional chelators (BFC). The Cu(I) is immobilized to the surfaceof the microreactor usingTris-[(1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl]amine (TBTA).

FIG. 14 provides an illustration of different designs for an exemplaryconjugation microreactor. The thicker lines indicate microchannels withstaggered herringbone grooves on one surface. Cu(I) catalyst isimmobilized on all surfaces.

FIG. 15 provides a comparison of click reaction efficiencies for aconventional reactor and the microreactor as a function of residencetime.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Radiometal-based radiopharmaceuticals, used as imaging and therapeuticagents in nuclear medicine, may include a radiometal that is bound to atargeting biomolecule (BM) using a bifunctional chelator (BFC).Conventional, macro-scale radiolabeling methods use an excess of theBFC-BM conjugate (ligand) to achieve high radiolabeling yields.Subsequently, to achieve maximal specific activity (minimal amount ofunlabeled ligand), extensive chromatographic purification is required toremove unlabeled ligand, often resulting in longer synthesis times andloss of imaging sensitivity due to radioactive decay.

A microreactor that overcomes the above issues through integration ofefficient mixing and heating strategies while working with small volumesof concentrated reagents is described. The general design of themicroreactor and its usage are described here, followed by a detaileddescription of an exemplary microreactor design and experiments carriedout using the microreactor. The microreactor may be employed forproducing radiolabeled complexes and also for biomolecule conjugation.

1 Introduction to the Microreactor

Referring to FIGS. 1( a) and 1(b), the microreactor 10 includes amicrochannel 3 for fluid flow, where the microchannel 3 includes amixing portion comprising one or more passive mixing elements 8. Themicroreactor 10 also includes at least one reservoir 5 for incubating amixed fluid. The reservoir 5 is in fluid communication with themicrochannel 3 and is disposed downstream of the mixing portion 3.

The mixing portion may be a downstream mixing portion 7 b and there mayalso be an upstream mixing portion 7 a of the microchannel 3. A firstinlet 1 is positioned upstream of the upstream mixing portion forintroduction of a first reagent, a second inlet 2 is positioned upstreamof the upstream mixing portion 7 a for introduction of a second reagent,and a third inlet 4 is positioned between the upstream mixing portion 7a and the downstream mixing portion 7 b for introduction of a thirdreagent. Referring to FIG. 1( b), the upstream mixing portion 7 a is ina first straight portion 3 a of the microchannel 3 and the downstreammixing portion 7 b is in a second straight portion 3 b of themicrochannel 3. The first and second straight portions 3 a, 3 b are thusconnected. In the example of FIGS. 1( a) and 1(b), the microchannel 3defines a serpentine flow path, where the second straight portion 3 b isarranged substantially parallel to the first straight portion 3 a.

In the example of FIGS. 1( a) and 1(b), the passive mixing elements 8comprise a series of grooves in a wall of the microchannel 3. Thisseries of grooves defines a staggered herringbone pattern as shown inthe inset of FIG. 1( b) and create a chaotic micromixer. Generallyspeaking, the one or more passive mixing elements 8 may be selected fromthe group consisting of: multi-lamination micromixers; bifurcation feedmicromixers; interdigitated parallel flow micromixers; hydrodynamicfocusing micromixers; splitting, recombining and rearrangingmicromixers; and chaotic micromixers.

The microreactor may include a plurality of the reservoirs 5 arranged inseries, as shown in FIGS. 1( a) and 1(b). It is also contemplated thatthe microreactor may include a plurality of the reservoirs arranged inparallel. The reservoir(s) 5 may have an elongated shape in thedirection of fluid flow. For example, again referring to FIGS. 1( a) and1(b), a longitudinal cross-section of the elongated shape may be ahexagon. According to one embodiment, the reservoirs 5 may hold a totalvolume of fluid of between about 5 μL and about 1000 μL. The totalvolume may also be between about 10 μL and 5004, or between about 20 μLand 100 μL.

The upstream and downstream mixing portions 7 a, 7 b of the microchannel3 may each comprise a length of between about 0.1 cm and about 100 cm.The length may also lie between about 0.5 cm and about 10 cm, or betweenabout 1 cm and about 5 cm. The microchannel may have a total length ofbetween about 0.1 cm and about 100 cm, and the total length may also bebetween about 0.5 cm and about 50 cm, or between about 1 cm and about 20cm. The microchannel may have a height of between about 5 microns andabout 500 microns and a width of between about 5 microns and about 500microns. The height may also be between about 25 μm and 300 μm, orbetween about 50 μm and 200 μm, and the width may also be between about25 μm and 400 μm, or between about 50 μm and 300 μm.

The first reagent, the second reagent, and the third reagent introducedinto the microreactor may be selected from the group consisting of: aprecursor radiometal solution comprising a metallic radionuclide, abuffer solution comprising a weak chelating ligand (e.g., ammoniumacetate, sodium acetate, ammonium citrate), and a ligand solutioncomprising a bifunctional chelator. According to one embodiment, thefirst reagent comprises the radiometal solution, the second reagentcomprises the buffer solution, and the third reagent comprises theligand solution. According to another embodiment, only first and secondreagents are introduced to the microchannel at one or more of theinlets. For example, in a conjugation reaction, the first reagent may bea chelator solution comprising a bifunctional chelator and the secondreagent may be a biomolecule solution comprising a biomolecule.

Referring again to FIGS. 1( a) and 1(b), a method of preparing aradiolabeled complex includes flowing a radiometal solution comprising ametallic radionuclide through a downstream mixing portion 7 b of amicrochannel 3, where the downstream mixing portion 7 b includes one ormore passive mixing elements 8. A ligand solution comprising abifunctional chelator is also flowed through the downstream mixingportion 7 b, and the ligand solution and the radiometal solution arepassively mixed while in the downstream mixing portion 7 b to form amixed solution and to initiate a chelation reaction between the metallicradionuclide and the bifunctional chelator. The chelation reaction iscompleted to form a radiolabeled complex.

The method may further comprise, prior to flowing the radiometalsolution through the downstream mixing portion 7 b of the microchannel3, flowing a buffer solution and a precursor radiometal solutioncomprising the metallic radionuclide through an upstream mixing portion7 a of the microchannel 3, where the upstream mixing portion 7 aincludes one or more passive mixing elements 8. The buffer solution andthe precursor radiometal solution are passively mixed while in theupstream mixing portion 7 a to form the radiometal solution.

Completing the chelation reaction may entail halting the flow of eachsolution and incubating the mixed solution for an incubation timesufficient to form the radiolabeled complex. Referring again to FIGS. 1(a) and 1(b), the incubation may be carried out in a microfluidicreservoir 5 in fluid communication with the microchannel 3 and disposeddownstream of the downstream mixing portion 7 b. The method may furtherinclude flowing a fluid into the microfluidic reservoir after theincubation to force the mixed solution through a reservoir outlet 6. Theincubating may be carried out at a temperature between about 0° C. andabout 100° C. The temperature may also be between about 20° C. and about60° C. The incubation time is typically greater than 1 minute, and maybe from about 5 minutes to about 20 minutes.

The method may further or alternatively include forming a biomoleculeconjugate. A chelator solution comprising molecules with coordinationsites for radiometal (e.g., ⁶⁴Cu, ⁶⁸Ga) or signal-contrasting moleculebinding (e.g., optical dyes) and a biomolecule solution comprising cellor tissue targeting agents (e.g., tumor targeting molecules) may beflowed through a mixing portion of a “second” microchannel separate fromthe microchannel 3 described above, where the mixing portion of thesecond microchannel includes one or more passive mixing elements. Thechelator solution and the biomolecule solution are passively mixed toform a combined solution via a conjugation reaction, and a biomoleculeconjugate is thus formed. The combined solution may be a ligand solutionthat is used in the chelation reaction described above to form aradiolabeled complex; in this case, the second microchannel may be influid communication with the inlet 4 to the microchannel 3.Alternatively, the conjugation process may be employed to formbiomolecule conjugates for other applications, and the secondmicrochannel may be part of a microreactor that is not employed forpreparing radiolabeled complexes.

The second microchannel and the one or more passive mixing elementsemployed in a conjugation reaction such as that described above may haveany of the features and dimensions set forth above with respect to themicrochannel 3 (the “first” microchannel) and the passive mixingelements 8.

The method may further comprise, prior to flowing the chelator solutionand the biomolecule solution through the second microchannel,immobilizing a Cu (I) catalyst on one or more walls of the secondmicrochannel and a second reservoir. As discussed in greater detailbelow, immobilization of the Cu (I) catalyst may entail: attachingsilane acrylate to the wall; attaching a copper (I) stabilizing moleculeto the silane acrylate to form a pre-treated wall; and adding a Cu (I)stock solution to the pre-treated wall.

In either the radiolabeling or the conjugation process, the flowing ofeach of the solutions may occur at a flow rate between about 0.1 μl/minand about 5 mL/min. The flow rate may also be between about 1 μL/min andabout 500 μL/min, or between about 10 μL/min and about 100 μL/min. Thevolume of each of the solutions may be about 1000 μL or less. Forexample, the volume may be between about 1 μL and about 100 μL, orbetween about 10 μL and about 50 μL.

The metallic radionuclide employed for radiolabeling may be selectedfrom the group consisting of: 55Co, 60Cu, 61 Cu, 64Cu, 67Cu, 66Ga, 67Ga,68Ga, 110mIn, 111In, 177Lu, 52Mn, 186Re, 188Re, 44Sc, 94mTc, 99mTc, 48V,86Y, 90Y, and 89Zr. The metallic radionuclide may have a concentrationin the radiometal solution of about 10 mM or less. The concentration mayalso be at least about 50 or at least about 1 mM. According to oneembodiment, the molar ratio of the metallic radionuclide to thebifunctional chelator may be about 1:1.

The bifunctional chelator may be a polyaza macrocycle, such as atetraazacycloalkane, which may be selected from the group consisting of1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) andderivatives thereof, triethylenetetramine (TETA) and derivativesthereof, 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) andderivatives thereof, deferoxamine (desferral), diethylene triaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) and derivatives thereof, CHX-DTPA andderivatives thereof, CB-TE2A, and sarcophagine (SarAr). The chelator maybe conjugated to a targeting biomolecule

The targeting biomolecule may be selected from the group consisting ofibritumomab, tositumomab, epratuzumab, a carcinoembryonic antigen, atumor associated glycoprotein 72 antigen (Anti-TAG-72), an Anti-A33, anAnti-MUC-1, an Anti-gp 38 (folate receptor), an anti-G250 (carbonicanhydrase IX), somatostatin, gastrin, bombesin, glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1), Arginine-Glycine-Aspartic acid (RGD), neuropeptide-Y, stromalcell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), annexin, and hepcidin andcyclo(Arg-Gly-Asp-DPhe-Lys).

The radiolabeled complex may be obtained at a yield of at least about20%. For example, the yield may be at least about 50% or at least about80%.

As a model reaction, 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraaceticacid (DOTA) conjugated to the peptide cyclo(Arg-Gly-Asp-DPhe-Lys) isradiolabeled with ⁶⁴Cu²⁺. The microreactor (made frompolydimethylsiloxane and glass) can withstand 260 mCi of activity over720 hours. Additionally, once the negatively-charged glass surface ofthe microreactor is saturated with injected positive ions, minimalretention of the ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ (<5%) occurs for subsequent injections. A directcomparison between the radiolabeling yields obtained using themicroreactor and conventional radiolabeling methods shows that improvedmixing and heat transfer in the microreactor leads to higher yields foridentical reaction conditions. Most importantly, by using small volumes(˜10 μL) of concentrated solutions of reagents (>50 μM), yields of over90% are obtainable in the microreactor when using a 1:1 stoichiometry ofradiometal to BFC-BM. These high yields obviate the need for achromatographic purification process to remove unlabeled ligand. Theresults reported here demonstrate the potential of microreactortechnology to improve the production of patient-tailored doses ofradiometal-based radiopharmaceuticals in the clinic.

The remainder of this disclosure is arranged as follows: after adiscussion of the design of the microreactor and of the motivationsbehind the incorporation of its features, the results of aninvestigation into the compatibility of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ with PDMS and glass, thematerials used in the construction of the microreactor, are described.Also presented are results of an evaluation of the performance of themicroreactor conducted using a model radiolabeling reaction: thechelation of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ by1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA)conjugated to the peptide cyclo(Arg-Gly-Asp-DPhe-Lys) (cyclo(RGDfK)).The resulting radiotracer has potential applications in the detection ofcancer via PET. In this evaluation, the effects of incubation time,temperature, and synthesis method (micro-scale vs. macro-scale) on theradiolabeling yield for 1:1 stoichiometric ratios of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ toDOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) are examined. Finally, a range of reagentconcentrations is established at which high radiolabeling yields areobtainable (>90%) and for which chromatographic separation of unlabeledBFC-BMs is no longer necessary for the clinical production ofradiopharmaceuticals.

2 Design and Testing 2.1 Design of the Microreactor

Presented here is an exemplary PDMS-based, microfluidic reactor forlabeling BFC-BMs with radiometals. Referring to FIGS. 1( a) and 1(b),the microreactor includes three key elements: (1) a serpentinemicrochannel for mixing, in which staggered herringbone grooves aredefined using soft lithography; (2) a series of reservoirs for theincubation of the radiometal-ligand mixture; and (3) a thin-film heaterfor heating the mixture.

Serpentine Mixing Channel:

The microreactor incorporates a passive mixer (Stroock et al., Science,2002, 295 (647-651)) to minimize diffusive limitations to the overallrate of the radiolabeling reaction. Generally, in the laminar, lowReynolds number flow that occurs at the microscale, when two streams ofreagents are brought in contact, a depletion zone forms as a result ofthe consumption of the reagents at the interface between the twostreams. This depletion zone grows in the transverse direction as thestreams flow axially along the channel. As a result, the reagents mustdiffuse across increasingly longer distances in order for the reactionto proceed. The small scale of microfluidic systems renders them lesssusceptible to the growth of large depletion zones than macro-scalesystems (the distance for diffusion, Δr[m], is ultimately limited tohalf the width of a microchannel, w/2˜100 μm. However, the time scalefor diffusion across the channel in microfluidic systems, τ_(D)=Δr²/D,where D [m² s⁻¹] is the diffusivity of the reagent, can still besignificant (on the order of minutes), particularly for large moleculesthat have low diffusivities in water (D<10⁻¹¹ m² s⁻¹), such as proteinsand antibodies, compared to the time scale of the reaction, τ_(D)=1/kC₀^(n), where k [M⁻¹¹ S⁻¹] is the reaction rate constant, C₀ [M] is theinitial concentration of the reagent, and n is the order of thereaction. Thus, depletion zones can impose diffusive mass transportlimitations on the rate of a reaction that occurs in a microchannel andshould be avoided, particularly for high-throughput reactions with fastkinetics.

Passive mixing of reagents, generated by staggered herringbone grooves,is introduced to further reduce, and potentially eliminate entirely, thelimitation to reaction kinetics caused by depletion zones. The staggeredherringbone grooves in the mixing channel induce chaotic stirring in thecross-section of the flow that stretches and folds the interface betweenthe co-flowing, laminar streams. This stretching and folding reduces themaximum distance, Δr, that the solutes in the initially separate streamsmust diffuse in order to form a homogeneous mixture and to react,resulting in smaller depletion zones, and thus a reduced potential fordiffusive mass transport limitations on the rate of reaction. Themaximum diffusive distance for chaotic stirring can be approximated by,Δr=w/2 exp(−Δy/λ), where w [m] is the width of the microchannel, Δy [m]is the distance traveled along the axis of the microchannel, and λ [m]is a characteristic length determined by the geometry of thetrajectories of the chaotic stirring. Based on this equation and theestimated value of λ˜2 mm for the chaotic stirring induced by thegrooves, once the two streams have reached the end of a 3 cm-long,grooved microchannel, Δr will have decreased by roughly six orders ofmagnitude, yielding a reduction in τ_(D) of 12 orders of magnitude. Thisdrastic reduction in mixing time eliminates any mass transportlimitations to the reaction rates, as is desired for the radiometallabeling chemistries pursued here. Furthermore, the relatively shortlength of the mixing channel afforded by using chaotic stirring, asopposed to the longer channel lengths that would be required whenrelying solely on diffusion to mix, enables the use of high flow rates(>500 μL min⁻¹), without developing prohibitively large pressure drops.This aspect is useful for high-throughput radiolabeling, when chelationrates are fast.

Reservoirs and Heater:

For the case when chelation rates are slow, the microreactorincorporates a series of reservoirs and a thin film heater. The highdegree of homogeneity of the reagent mixture that is accomplishedthrough the use of staggered herringbone grooves for mixing allows forthe accumulation of clinically relevant volumes of the mixture (up to 50μL per run) in the reservoirs, without provoking mass transportlimitations to the rate of the radiolabeling reaction. If regions ofincomplete mixing were present, these regions, and the depletion zonesthat develop within them, would be magnified through the expansion ofthe microchannel into the wider reservoir, and diffusive mass transportlimitations would be exacerbated. In the microreactor presented here,the well-mixed solution of reagents can be incubated for arbitraryperiods of time at elevated temperatures to achieve high yields, andthen flushed quickly from the microreactor for use.

The reservoirs can have any of a variety of shapes, including theelongated hexagonal shape shown in FIG. 1( a)-(b), or a triangularentrance region, a rectangular central section and a multi-channelmanifold at the exit, as shown in FIG. 2( b). Viscous drag at the wallsof the hexagonal reservoirs results in the elongation of the flowprofile, as is shown in FIG. 2( a). The consequence of this elongationis that, while the mixture near the center of a reservoir can be easilyflushed out, using a single reservoir-volume of flushing solution, themixture near the edge of the reservoir may be left behind and mayrequire additional flushing to eject. A 3-channel manifold configurationreduces the volume of additional flushing solution required to fullyflush the incubated mixture from the reservoir by increasing therelative flow rate at the edge of the reservoir and thereby reducing theelongation of the parabolic profile of flow through the reservoir, asshown in FIG. 2( b).

In an experiment, water was injected into a hexagonal reservoir filledwith ink (flow rate=20 μL/min). The height of the reservoir was 100 μm.The central, rectangular portion of the reservoir was 5 mm wide and 10mm long, and both of the triangular sections on either side of therectangular section were 5 mm wide and 10 mm long. The results are shownin FIG. 2( a).

In another experiment, ink was injected into a reservoir filled withwater (flow rate=20 μL/min) and including a 3-channel manifold at theoutlet end. The height of the reservoir was 100 μm. The rectangularsection toward the outlet was 5 mm wide and 20 mm long. The triangularsection to the left of the rectangular section was 5 mm wide and 10 mmlong. The width of outlet channels 1 and 2 were 200 μm and the width ofoutlet channel 3 was 50 μm. The results are shown in FIG. 2( b). Theratio of the widths of the exit channels of the reservoir can beoptimized to further flatten the flow profile.

The simple features of the microreactor discussed above provide a greatdeal of flexibility for radiolabeling BFC-BMs. The microreactor canperform both high-throughput, continuous flow radiolabeling for fastchelation rates, and semi-batch, incubated radiolabeling for slowchelation rates. In addition, the simplicity of the design (i.e., thelack of extensive networks of microchannels and of valves and theirrequired ancillary equipment) is beneficial for its envisioned use inthe clinic as an inexpensive, disposable microreactor for the custom,on-demand synthesis of radiopharmaceuticals.

2.2 Testing of the Microreactor

The microreactor was validated by labeling a BFC-BM conjugate with⁶⁴Cu^(2+.) The BFC-BM conjugate included the bifunctional chelator1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA), and thepeptide cyclo(Arg-Gly-Asp-DPhe-Lys) (cyclo(RGDfK)). This peptide targetsα_(V)β₃ integrin, a receptor that is up-regulated on the surface ofcells undergoing angiogenesis. The high occurrence of angiogenesis intumors results in a higher concentration of α_(V)β₃ integrin, andtherefore a higher concentration of bound, radiolabeled RGD, in contrastwith the surrounding, healthy tissue. Radiolabeled RGD-based imagingagents are promising candidates for the imaging of tumors via PET.

The radiolabeling reaction, summarized in FIG. 3( a), includes threesteps: (1) the addition of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ in 0.1N HCl (the normal state of theradiometal as it is received the cyclotron) to 10 mM ammonium acetate(NH₄OAc) (pH=6.8) to form ⁶⁴Cu(OAc)₂ through ligand exchange; (2) theaddition of DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) (see FIG. 3( b)) in 10 mM NH₄OAc (pH=6.8)to the ⁶⁴Cu(OAc)₂ mixture to form ⁶⁴Cu-DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) throughchelation; (3) the incubation of the ⁶⁴Cu-DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) mixture atroom or elevated temperature to drive the chelation reaction tocompletion. The two-step combination of reagents is performed in theserpentine mixing channel of the microreactor, with radiometal andbuffer solutions mixing in the first leg of the channel (3 a in FIG. 1(b)) and ligand and radiometal-buffer solutions mixing in the second legof the channel (3 b in FIG. 1( b)).

After passing through the mixing channels, the reagents flow into thereservoirs, where they are incubated at room or elevated temperaturesfor a certain period of time. This incubation step is important, as thechelation of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ by DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) likely involves therate-limiting rearrangement of a di- or mono-protonated intermediatebefore chelation is complete, as is the case for the formation oflanthanide complexes (Ln³⁺) with DOTA-peptide conjugates.

3 Materials and Methods 3.1 Chemicals

RTV 615 poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) was obtained from GeneralElectric Company (Waterford, N.Y.). SU-8 2050 was obtained fromMicroChem Corporation (Newton, Mass.).(Tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl)trichlorosilane was obtained fromGelest, Inc. (Morrisville, Pa.). Cyclo(RGDfK) was purchased fromPeptides International, Inc. (Louisville, Ky.).1,4,7,10-Tetraazacyclodo-decane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid mono(N-hydroxysuccinimide ester) (DOTA-NHS-ester) was purchased fromMacrocyclics (Dallas, Tex.). ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ in 0.1M HCl was produced atWashington University School of Medicine, and obtained through theRadionuclide Resource for Cancer Applications. De-ionized water (DI-H₂O)was produced using a Millipore Milli-Q water system. All other chemicalsand solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.).

3.2 Equipment

Three sets of female 1/4-28 to female Luer lock adaptors with ferrulesand nuts, PEEK tubing of 1/16″ OD and 0.01″ ID, and a NanoTight kit with1/16″×0.027″ FEP sleeves, obtained from Upchurch Scientific (Oak Harbor,Wash.) and Microbore PTFE tubing (0.012″ ID×0.030″ OD) obtained fromCole-Parmer (Vernon Hills, Ill.) were assembled to connect syringes tothe microreactor. The 75 mm×50 mm×1 mm glass slide, used to assemble themicroreactor, and the Fisher Vortex Genie 2 were obtained from FisherScientific (Pittsburgh, Pa.). A test grade, 3″ silicon wafer, obtainedfrom University Wafer (South Boston, Mass.) was used to fabricate theSU-8 mold for the microreactor. Three microliter flow modular pumpcomponents, which included a syringe pump, a pump driver circuit, and apower supply, were obtained from Harvard Apparatus (Holliston, Mass.).The Kapton-insulated, 2″×2″, thin film heater, the Omega CN740temperature controller, and an Omega SA 1-RTD probe were obtained fromOmega Engineering (Stamford, Conn.). The Harrick plasma cleaner wasobtained from Harrick Plasma (Ithaca, N.Y.). Eppendorf tubes wereobtained from MIDSCI, Inc. (St. Louis, Mo.). The BioScan AR-2000radio-TLC plate reader was purchased from Bioscan, Inc. (Washington,D.C.). The Thermomixer was obtained from Eppendorf North America(Hauppauge, N.Y.). Radio-TLC plates were obtained from Whatman ThinLayer Chromatography (Piscataway, N.J.). Gas-tight, microliter syringeswere obtained from Hamilton Co. (Reno, Nev.). The Waters HPLC systemsused in the purification of DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) was obtained from WatersCorporation (Milford, Mass.). The Capintec CRC-712M radioisotope dosecalibrator used to measure activities for retention experiments wasobtained from Capintec, Inc. (Ramsey, N.J.).

3.3 Synthesis and Purification of DOTA-Cyclo(RGDfK)

DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) was prepared by reacting a solution of 6.03 mgcyclo(RGDfK) and 14.0 μL triethylamine (10 eqv.) in 1.0 mLdimethylformamide (DMF) with 8.38 mg DOTA-NHS (1.1 eqv). After stirringfor 3 hours at room temperature, 3 mL of DI-H₂O were added and stirredfor another 30 minutes to hydrolyze the excess DOTA-NHS ester. The crudeDOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) was then purified on a Waters HPLC system using anAlltech Econosil C18 semi-preparative column (10 μm, 4.6 mm×250 mm) witha mobile phase of 15 v % acetonitrile and 85 v % de-ionized water with0.1 v % trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), at a flow rate of 3.0 mL minute⁻¹.Under these conditions, the DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) eluted at 13.5 minutes.The identity and purity of the purified DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) peptide wasconfirmed by LC-MS using an Alltech Econosil C18 analytical column (10μm, 4.6 mm×250 mm). The analysis was performed using the followinggradient of 0.1 v % TFA in de-ionized water (A) and acetonitrile (B)with a flow rate of 1.0 mL minute⁻¹: 0-5 minutes: 100% A; 20 minutes:60% A, 40% B; 28-33 minutes: 10% A, 90% B; 34-40 minutes: 100% A.

3.4 Fabrication of the Microreactor

An exemplary microreactor was fabricated using SU-8-basedsoft-lithography techniques for PDMS. The dimensions of the featuresshown in FIG. 1 are as follows: serpentine microchannel (100 μm high,200 μm wide, 10.7 cm long), five hexagonal reservoirs (100 μm high, 5 mmwide, 3 cm long), microchannels between reservoirs (100 μm high, 200 μmwide, 7.2 mm long). The total volume of all five reservoirs is 50microliters. The staggered herringbone grooves in the mixing channels(see expanded view in FIG. 1 b) were designed to have the same geometryas those developed by Stroock et al. An SU-8 mold of the features wasfabricated as follows: (1) negative images of the microchannels, inlets,outlets, and reservoirs were printed on one transparency film and thethose of the grooves were printed on a second transparency film, using a5080 dpi printer; (2) the pattern of the microchannels, inlets, outlets,and reservoirs was transferred from the first transparency to a 100μm-thick layer of SU-8 2050 spun onto a silicon wafer, viaphotolithography; (3) the pattern of the grooves was transferred fromthe second transparency to a second, 50 μm-thick layer of SU-8 2050 thatwas spun over the first layer, following an alignment step so as todefine the grooves directly above the mixing channel; (4) unexposed SU-8was dissolved using propylene glycol methyl ether acetate (PGMEA), andthe exposed silicon surface was passivated via vapor deposition of(tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl)trichlorosilane, under vacuum.PDMS (10:1 ratio of precursor to curing agent) was then poured over theSU-8 mold and cured at 60° C. for 2+ hours. The cured PDMS was removedfrom the mold, inlet and outlet holes were punched, and the PDMS wasbonded to a 75 mm×50 mm×1 mm glass slide, after 1 minute plasmatreatment of both components with a Harrick Plasma Cleaner (RF level:Hi, Pressure: 500-1000 mTorr), followed by baking at 60° C. for 12hours.

3.5 Operation of the Microreactor

The microreactor may be operated in semi-batch mode or in continuousflow mode. Upon entering the microreactor through inlets 1 and 2,respectively, a radiometal solution and a buffer solution flowed throughthe mixing channel (3 a, 3 b in FIG. 1( b)). As the two solutions flowedalong the microchannel, they were mixed by the chaotic advection inducedby the geometry of the grooves. Once the buffer and radiometal solutionsreached the end of the first mixing channel, the ligand (BFC-BM)solution was pumped into the microreactor through inlet 4 and mixed withthe radiometal-buffer mixture in a second mixing microchannel withstaggered herringbone grooves defined in the ceiling. The mixed reagentsthen filled a series of five hexagonal reservoirs (5 in FIGS. 1(a),(b)), after which the flow was stopped and the mixture was heated tothe desired temperature and allowed to react for a specified incubationtime. After this incubation time, the buffer solution was pumped intothe microreactor to flush out the product, through the outlet (6 inFIGS. 1( a),(b)), for collection. Other fluids (liquids or gases) may beemployed in lieu of the buffer solution to flush out the product.

A schematic diagram of the system used to operate the microreactor isshown in FIG. 4. The flow of each reagent stream, radiometal, buffer,and ligand, into the microreactor was driven by syringe pumps that werecontrolled by a LabVIEW virtual instrument (VI). Communication betweenthe VI and the syringe pump drivers was facilitated by a serialconnection. The VI was used to set the individual flow rates andregulate the timing of the pumps, with inputs for controlling theincubation time, the total flow rate, the desired volume of product (themaximum being the total volume of the reservoirs, ˜50 μL), and thestoichiometric molar ratios of buffer-to-radiometal andligand-to-radiometal. For radiolabeling at elevated temperatures, athin-film heater, placed in contact with the glass surface of themicroreactor, was used to heat the microreactor, and a temperaturecontroller and resistance temperature detector (RTD) probe were used tomaintain the temperature within ±1° C. of the desired temperatureset-point. The radiometal syringe pump, heater, and microreactor wereshielded on four sides and below with 2″ of lead shielding. Theradiometal syringe was fitted with a 7.5 cm length of PEEK tubingconnected to an Upchurch Luer lock fitting. The PDMS microreactor wasfit with a 10 cm length of PTFE tubing connected to an Upchurch NanoTitefitting. The syringe and PEEK “needle” were inserted into the fittingand tightened.

3.6 Measurement of the Retention of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺

A 3 cm-long, 200 μm-wide, 100 μm-tall microchannel with staggeredherringbone grooves, fabricated from PDMS and glass and with a volume of˜0.6 μL, was used for these experiments. Prior to use, the microchannelwas cleaned with 50 of 1N nitric acid to remove trace metals, andflushed with 5 mL of 10 mM NH4OAc buffer solution.

Pre-treatment with Cu2+/Na+: 50 μL of a 10 mM CuCl2/NaCl solution wasinjected into the microchannel and allowed to sit for 30 minutes. Themicrochannel was then flushed with 5 mL of 10 mM NH4OAc buffer solution(pH=6.8).

Retention measurement: 30 μL of no carrier-added (only radioactive)64Cu2+ in 10 mM NH4OAc buffer solution (pH=6.80) was injected into themicrochannel. After 10 minutes, the 64Cu2+ solution was displaced fromthe microchannel by 200 μL of air, via syringe. The microchannel wasthen flushed with 200 μL of 10 mM NH4OAc buffer. The percent of injectedactivity retained in the microchannel was calculated from the knownactivity of the injected solution, and the difference between theactivity left behind in the microchannel after flushing and the initialactivity of the microchannel measured before the 64Cu2+ solution wasinjected, all measured with the Capintec radioisotope dose calibrator.

3.7 Radiolabeling of DOTA-Cyclo(RGDfK)

Stock solutions of carrier-added ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ were prepared by first dilutingthe solution obtained from the cyclotron (20 mCi ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ in 0.1M HCl)with 10 mM NH₄OAc (pH=6.8) to give a specific activity of 1 mCi μL⁻¹.The various copper solutions were then prepared from this original stocksolution. In order to prepare a 200 μM carrier-added ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ solution, 20μL of the 1 mCi ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ solution was mixed with 20 μL of 10 mMnon-radioactive copper solution and 960 μL of 10 mM NH₄OAc (pH=6.8). Thedifferent concentrations of carrier-added ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ solutions listed insections 3.7.1 and 3.7.2 were obtained by the dilution of the above 200μM carrier-added ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ solution with 10 mM NH₄OAc.

Stock solutions of 10 mM DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) were prepared by firstdissolving 10.0 mg of purified DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) (section 3.3) in 100 μLof a mixture of 10 mM NH₄OAc (pH=6.8) and acetonitrile (MeCN) (50:50 v%), and then diluting these solutions with 10 mM NH₄OAc (pH=6.8) to givefinal concentrations of 200, 100, 40, and 2 μM DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK).

3.7.1 Conventional Radiolabeling Procedures

Conventional radiolabeling was performed using two methods: (1) mixing,incubation and heating of a total volume of 10.5 μL of solution with aThermomixer, and (2) mixing of a total volume of 105 μL of solutionusing a vortexer, followed by continued mixing, incubation and heatingwith a Thermomixer. For method (1), 3.0 μL of 100 μM DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK)solution was first added to 1.5 μL of 10 mM NH₄OAc (pH=6.8) in a 1.6 mLEppendorf tube. Then, 6.0 μL of 50 μM ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ solution was added to themixture, and the Eppendorf tube was placed in the Thermomixer andincubated for 12 minutes at a temperature of 23, 37 or 47° C. For method(2), 30 μL of 100 μM DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) solution was first added to 15 μLof 10 mM NH₄OAc (pH=6.8) in a 1.6 mL Eppendorf tube. Then, 60 μL of 50μM ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ solution was added to the mixture, the mixture was vortexedfor 10 seconds, and the Eppendorf tube was placed in the Thermomixer andincubated for 12 minutes at a temperature of 23, 37 or 47° C. The finalconcentration of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ and DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) was 28.6 μM in bothmethods. Following the incubation period, the extent of reaction wasdetermined as described in section 3.7.3.

3.7.2 Microreactor Radiolabeling Procedure

The general mode of operation of an exemplary microreactor is describedin section 3.5. For the radiolabeling experiments summarized in FIG. 5(a) (effect of residence time on extent of reaction) and FIG. 5( b)(effect of mixing method and temperature on extent of reaction), thefollowing solutions were used: (1) 50 μM carrier-added ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ solution,(2) 100 μM DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) stock solution, and (3) 10 mM NH₄OAc(pH=6.8) buffer. Using the LabVIEW interface, the pumps were programmedto combine the radiometal (1), ligand (2), and buffer (3) solutions withthe same volumetric ratios as those used for the conventionalradiolabeling procedure, giving a ligand-to-metal molar ratio of 1:1 anda final concentration of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ and DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) of 28.6 μM. Thetotal flow rate was set to 50 μL minute⁻¹, the total volume was set to20 μL (an additional 30 μL of buffer was pumped into the microreactor tofill all the reservoirs). For the experiments in FIG. 5( a), thetemperature was set to 37° C., and the incubation time was set to 5, 10,and 20 minutes (resulting in total residence times, t_(RES)=7, 12, and22 minutes: e.g., 1 minute for filling+10 minutes for incubation+1minute for flushing). For the experiments in FIG. 5( b), the incubationtime was set to 10 minutes (t_(RES)=12 minutes), and the temperature wasset to 23, 37 and 47° C. After the collection of product, the extent ofreaction was determined as described in section 3.7.3.

For the radiolabeling experiments summarized in FIG. 6 (effect ofconcentration on extent of reaction), combinations of stock solutionsand buffer-to-metal molar ratio inputs were used to give the followingfinal concentrations of radiometal and ligand (1:1 molar ratio): 1 μM (2μM stock solutions, 1:1 buffer-to-radiometal ratio), 10 μM (40 μM stocksolutions, 500:1 buffer-to-radiometal ratio), 20 μM (40 μM stocksolutions, 1:1 buffer-to-radiometal ratio), 30 μM (100 μM stocksolutions, 130:1 buffer-to-radiometal ratio), 50 μM (100 μM stocksolutions, 1:1 buffer-to-radiometal ratio), and 90 μM (200 μM stocksolutions, 11:1 buffer-to-radiometal ratio). Experiments were performedwith the same settings as listed above, and with t_(RES)=12 minutes andat a temperature of 37° C. After the collection of product, the extentof reaction was determined as described in section 3.7.3.

Throughout the course of radiolabeling experiments, three trial runswere performed before data was recorded to ensure proper functioning ofthe microreactor after syringe pump or heater settings were changed andafter depleted syringes were replenished.

3.7.3 Measurement of Radiolabeling Yield

At the end of each reaction run, a 1 μL aliquot of product was spottedonto a radio-TLC plate and developed using a mobile phase ofmethanol/10% ammonium formate buffer (2:1 volume ratio). Afterdeveloping, the radio-TLC plates were then counted using the Bioscanradio-TLC scanner to quantify free and bound ⁶⁴Cu²⁺. The radiolabelingyields were calculated by dividing the area of the radioactivity peakobtained for the bound ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ by the total area of the radioactivitypeaks obtained for both bound and free ⁶⁴CU²⁺.

4 Results and Discussion

4.1 Compatibility of PDMS/Glass with ⁶⁴Cu²⁺

The experiments discussed in this section were performed to determinethe compatibility of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ with the materials comprising themicroreactor. For microfluidic radiolabeling with ¹⁸F, the absorption ofthe radionuclide by PDMS can be a significant problem; previous work hasshown that up to 95% of an amount of injected activity can be retained.To determine whether similar issues may affect radiolabeling in thecurrent microreactor, the retention of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ and the ability of PDMSand glass to withstand the emissions of this radionuclide were examined.

FIG. 7 shows the percent of injected activity of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ retained in asingle microchannel (length˜3 cm, volume˜0.64) with staggeredherringbone grooves defined in the ceiling, for a series of injectionsof activity. The white bars represent data for a microchannel that hasbeen washed with nitric acid, and the grey bars represent data for amicrochannel that has been washed with nitric acid and then pre-treatedwith a non-radioactive Cu²⁺ solution (section 3.6). The microchannelthat was not pre-treated with Cu²⁺ solution retained a substantialportion of the activity of the first injection (˜70%), but retained only˜5% of the activity of subsequent injections. The microchannel that waspre-treated with Cu²⁺ solution retained only ˜15% of the activity of thefirst injection and also retained only ˜5% of the activity of subsequentinjections. The difference between the retention of the activity in thefirst injection in the pre-treated and non-pre-treated microchannels,and the decrease in retention of activity in subsequent injectionssuggest that ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ probably adheres to the walls of the microchannel,though once the surface is saturated, no further adhesion occurs. Theadhesion of the ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ is presumably due to non-specific, electrostaticinteractions between the positively-charged copper ions and thenegatively-charged glass surface; polymer coatings with similar chemicalgroups to those of PDMS are used to minimize electrostatic interactionsbetween positively-charged solutes and the surfaces of capillaryelectrophoresis equipment made of glass.

To confirm the hypothesis that non-specific electrostatic interactionsbetween the microchannel surface and the ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ are responsible for theretention observed in FIG. 7, a Na⁺ solution was used to block thesurface of the microchannel. Following this pre-treatment, the inventorsobserved the same decrease in the percentage of injected activityretained as for the case when the microchannel was pre-treated with theCu²⁺ solution (data not shown). From this and the preceding results, theinventors conclude that the retention of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ on the glass surface isprimarily due to electrostatic interactions and not due to absorption ofthe ions into the PDMS. The retention of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ in the microchannel canbe minimized either by changing the charge of the glass surface of themicrochannel to positive, by functionalizing the glass with apositively-charged silane, for example²⁵, or by fabricating themicroreactor completely in PDMS. Note: in the radiolabeling experimentsdiscussed in later sections, data for the first three reactionsperformed in the microreactor are ignored. This procedure ensures thatthe influence of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺retention on the measured extent of reaction isminimal, by saturating the surface of the microreactor with copper ions.

Over the course of the experiments performed in this work, a singlemicroreactor was employed. In total, the device was exposed to 260 mCiof radiation over 720 hours. Only after this exposure were signs ofdamage observed—the microreactor began leaking, indicating that the sealbetween the PDMS and glass had decayed. Thus, the device is sufficientlyrobust for its envisioned role as a single- or multiple-use (<20),disposable microreactor for radiolabeling.

4.2 Microfluidic Radiolabeling

In this section, the radiolabeling of DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) with ⁶⁴Cu²⁺using a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio of the two reagents is examined. Forthe purpose of evaluating the performance of the microreactor, allexperiments were performed using carrier-added ⁶⁴Cu²⁺, so that theconcentration of Cu²⁺ was known, and to maximize the number ofexperiments that could be performed with one batch of the radiometal.Thus, although the disclosure refers to ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ solutions, over 99% ofthe copper present in the solutions is not radioactive. For the purposeof operating the microreactor in the clinic, in the production of PETimaging agents, for example, undiluted radiometal solution obtaineddirectly from the cyclotron would be used instead.

In FIG. 5 a, the radiolabeling yield (i.e., the percent of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺chelated by DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK)) obtained by mixing 50 μM solutions of⁶⁴Cu²⁺ and DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) at a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio, andincubating the mixture at 37° C. for residence times, t_(RES), of 7, 12and 22 minutes, is presented. The data indicate that, at thisconcentration of reagents, over 80% of the radiometal is chelated after12 minutes. To test reproducibility, the radiolabeling yield for thisresidence time was measured for solutions made from three separateproductions of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺. The standard deviation for this average is largerthan those for experiments that were performed with the same batch of⁶⁴Cu²⁺ (7 and 22 minutes), indicating the variability of the specificactivity of the ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ between productions. This variability results inchanging amounts of trace metal contaminants that can compete with Cu²⁺for chelation with DOTA (e.g., Ni, Fe, and Zn).

To contextualize the improvement in radiolabeling provided by themicroreactor, a direct comparison is made between the radiolabelingyield obtained by the microreactor and those obtained throughconventional radiolabeling methods, again using a 1:1 stoichiometricratio of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ to DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK). To make this comparison, aresidence time of 12 minutes and a radiometal/ligand concentration of˜30 μM is chosen such that the radiolabeling yield is high enough to bemeasured accurately, but does not reach 100% in the microreactor, basedon the results in FIG. 5 a. FIG. 5 b shows the radiolabeling yield forthe chelation of ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ by DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) obtained using threedifferent radiolabeling methods at three different temperatures.‘Conventional, 10 μL’ and ‘Conventional, 100 μL’ represent data obtainedwhen the reaction was performed using conventional radiolabelingprocedures with small volumes (˜10 μL) and large volumes (˜100 μL),respectively (section 3.7.1). The yields obtained using the microreactorat 37 and 47° C. were significantly higher than those obtained using the10 μL conventional procedure. The inventors speculate that the superiormixing of small volumes of reagents achieved by the microreactorresulted in this improved performance. To support this hypothesis, theyields obtained using the microreactor were compared to those obtainedusing conventional procedures with a larger volume (Conventional, 100μL), in which more efficient mixing is possible through vortexing. Forboth methods, the yield is the same at 23 and 47° C., withinexperimental error, indicating that the mixing achieved by themicroreactor and by macro-scale vortexing is sufficient to overcome thediffusive mass transfer limitations to the radiolabeling reaction thathinder the performance of the ‘Conventional, 104’ method. For themicroreactor, the yield obtained at 37° C. is the same as that obtainedat 47° C., within experimental error. This result suggests that themicroreactor achieves the maximum yield possible for reagentconcentrations of ˜30 μM and t_(RES)=12 minutes at a lower temperaturethan the conventional method, and may also suggest improved performancethrough enhanced heat transfer in the microreactor.

In addition to enhancing reaction rates through efficient mass and heattransfer, the ability of microfluidic systems to manipulate smallvolumes of concentrated reagents can potentially lead to highradiolabeling yields. In FIG. 6, radiolabeling yield is plotted as afunction of the final concentration of 64Cu2+, MF, (i.e., theconcentration after all solutions are mixed together) for astoichiometric ratio of 64Cu2+ to DOTA-cyclo(RGDfK) of 1:1, t_(RES)=12minutes, and an incubation temperature of 37° C. The data show that, byincreasing the final concentration of the reagents to >50 μM, yieldsapproaching >90% are obtainable with these reaction conditions. Due tothe 1:1 stoichiometric ratio, the need for the separation of unlabeledBFC-BMs is eliminated once yields reach >90%. As mentioned previously,the concentration of radiometal obtained from the cyclotron is typically1-2 mCi≈4 picomoles in ˜10 μL, or ˜0.4 μM. Final concentrations ≧50 μMcould be obtained for the clinical production of radiopharmaceuticals by(1) minimizing the dilution of the radiometal solution by using highlyconcentrated solutions of buffer and ligand, and (2) implementing amicrofluidic means of increasing the concentration of the radiometal,such as through the evaporation of water from the radiometal solution.

The microfluidic reactor has further been employed to (a) validate theadhesion of another radiometal, gallium-68 (⁶⁸Ga), to the reactor; (b)radiolabel two different bifunctional chelators (BFCs) with twodifferent radiometals; (c) perform an on-chip parametric study to obtainhigh radiolabeling efficiencies; and (d) radiolabel a large biomoleculeas a model for antibody or protein.

4.2.1. Adhesion of Gallium-68 to Microreactor

Similar to copper-64, the adhesion of gallium-68 to microreactor isinvestigated.

Method:

A 3 cm-long, 200 μm-wide, 100 μm-tall microchannel with staggeredherringbone grooves, fabricated from poly(dimethylsiloxane) PDMS andglass and with a volume of ˜0.64, was used for these experiments. Priorto use, the microchannel was cleaned with 1 mL of 1N nitric acid toremove trace metals, and flushed with 3 mL of 10 mM NH₄OAc buffersolution.

For pre-treatment with Ga³⁺/Na⁺: 100 μL of a 10 mM GaCl₃/100 mM NaClsolution was injected into the microchannel and allowed to sit for 30minutes. The microchannel was then flushed with 1 mL of 10 mM NH₄OAcbuffer solution (pH=6.8).

For retention measurement, 30 μL of no carrier-added (only radioactive)⁶⁸Ga³+ in 10 mM NH₄OAc buffer solution (pH=6.80) was injected into themicrochannel. After 10 minutes, the 68Ga³⁺ solution was displaced fromthe microchannel by 200 μL of air, via syringe. The microchannel wasthen flushed with 200 μL of 10 mM NH4OAc buffer. The percent of injectedactivity retained in the microchannel was calculated from the knownactivity of the injected solution, and the difference between theactivity left behind in the microchannel after flushing and the initialactivity of the microchannel measured before the ⁶⁸Ga³⁺ solution wasinjected, all measured with the Capintec radioisotope dose calibrator.

Results and Discussion

FIG. 8 shows the percent of injected activity of ⁶⁸Ga³⁺ retained in asingle microchannel with staggered herringbone grooves defined in theceiling, for a series of injections of activity. The darker barsrepresent data for a microchannel that has been washed with nitric acid,and the paler bars represent data for a microchannel that has beenwashed with nitric acid and then pre-treated with a non-radioactive Ga³⁺solution. The microchannel that was not pre-treated with Ga³⁺ solutionretained higher activity of the first injection (˜17%), but retained alower activity (˜12%) of the activity of subsequent injections. Thedifference between the retention of the activity in the first injectionin the pre-treated and non-pre-treated microchannels, and the decreasein retention of activity in subsequent injections suggest that⁶⁸Ga³⁺probably adheres to the walls of the microchannel, though once thesurface is saturated, no further adhesion occurs. The adhesion of the⁶⁸Ga³⁺ is presumably due to non-specific, electrostatic interactionsbetween the positively-charged copper ions and the negatively-chargedglass surface. This adhesion behaviour is similar to copper (⁶⁴Cu²⁺),though gallium adheres less than copper.

To confirm the hypothesis that non-specific electrostatic interactionsbetween the microchannel surface and the ⁶⁸Ga³⁺ are responsible for theretention observed, a Na⁺ solution was used to block the surface of themicrochannel. Following this pre-treatment, a similar decrease wasobserved in the percentage of injected activity retained as for the casewhen the microchannel was pretreated with the Ga³⁺ solution (data notshown). From this and the preceding results, the inventors concludedthat the retention of ⁶⁸Ga³⁺ on the glass surface is primarily due toelectrostatic interactions and not due to absorption of the ions intothe PDMS.

4.2.2. Radiolabeling of Two Different BFCs with Two DifferentRadiometals

The versatility of our microreactor for labeling different chelatorswith different radiometals is demonstrated. Previously, the microreactorwas used to label DOTA-RGD with copper-64, where RGD is a tumortargeting biomolecule.

Method:

The microreactor design and the procedures employed for samplepreparation, conventional and microreactor-based labeling, and analysisare similar to those described previously. The radioactive gallium wasprocured from a gallium generator and used without further purification.The bifunctional chelators used were1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA), and the radiometalswere copper-64 and gallium-68. The biomolecule was again RGD. Theconcentration of copper was 50 μM, while that of gallium was 100 μM forlabeling NOTA-RGD and 50 μM for DOTA-RGD. The ratio of the concentrationof radiometal-to-biomolecule was 1:1. The residence time (10 minutes)and labeling temperature (37° C.) were maintained constant for all theexperiments.

Results and Discussion:

The radiolabeling schemes for ⁶⁴Cu-DOTA-RGD and ⁶⁸Ga-NOTA-RGD are shownin FIG. 9 (⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RGD is not shown).

The comparison of radiolabeling efficiencies for ⁶⁴Cu-DOTA-RGD,⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RGD and ⁶⁸Ga-NOTA-RGD between those obtained using themicroreactor and conventional procedures are shown in FIG. 10. Thehigher efficiencies were achieved using the microreactor due to the moreeffective mixing of small volumes, and enhanced heat transfer. Theinventors also observed the radiolabeling to be more reliable using themicroreactor, evident by the lower error bars for microreactor-basedlabeling. The improvement in performance of the microreactor is moreevident for radiolabeling with ⁶⁸Ga, as the labeling is more sensitiveto temperature, and the enhanced heat transfer in the microreactor isexpected to have a stronger influence on the labeling kinetics.

4.2.3. On-Chip Parametric Study for Maximizing Radiolabeling Efficiency

To demonstrate the application of the microreactor for screeningreaction conditions, a parametric study was performed to maximize theradiolabeling efficiency.

Method:

The radiometal-to-biomolecule concentration ratio was maintainedconstant at 1:1, as in the previous radiolabeling experiments (section2). The procedures for sample preparation, conventional andmicroreactor-based labeling, and analysis were also similar to those insection 2. The residence time and the concentration of radiometal werevaried.

Results and Discussion:

The parametric study for labeling three different studies is shown inFIG. 11. It was observed that radiolabeling efficiencies greater than90% could be achieved for radiometal concentrations greater than 50 μMwithin 20 minutes. More importantly, these high efficiencies wereachieved without using excess of any reagents, thus avoiding anychromatographic purification.

4.2.4. Labeling of Large Biomolecules Using the Microreactor

In addition to RGD, the microreactor is used to label a largebiomolecule, bovine serum albumin (BSA), for two reasons. Firstly, sincemany PET imaging agents use antibodies as targeting biomolecules, theapplication of the microreactor to label BSA, which serves a model forlabeling proteins or antibodies, is demonstrated. Secondly, BSA is amuch larger molecule compared to RGD, where the molecular weight of BSAis 66776 g/mol and that of RGD is only 603.7 g/mol. A larger moleculehas a lower diffusivity, and hence, the labeling reaction maybediffusion-limited.

Method:

For the labeling experiments, the concentrations of copper and galliumwere 1 μM and 5 μM, respectively. The residence time was 20 minutes, andthe labeling temperature was 37° C. The procedures for samplepreparation, conventional and microreactor-based labeling, and analysiswere also similar to those in section 2.

Results and Discussion:

The labeling results and the comparison with conventional procedures areshown in FIG. 12. The data reveal that the labeling efficiencies arehigher for the microreactor and more reliable. The high efficienciesalso indicate that the labeling in the microreactor is not diffusionlimited.

5 Conclusions of Radiolabeling Investigation

An exemplary microreactor made from PDMS and glass for radiolabelingbiomolecule-bifunctional chelator conjugates (BFC-BMs) with radiometalsfor application as imaging or therapeutic agents in nuclear medicine hasbeen described. The microreactor is able to efficiently mix smallvolumes of reagents (˜10 μL or less) by using chaotic advection that isinduced by staggered herringbone grooves defined in a mixingmicrochannel in which reagents are combined, and to incubate thereaction mixture at elevated temperatures after it fills severalmicro-reservoirs (total volume=50 μL). The performance of themicroreactor was tested by radiolabeling different BFCs, DOTA and NOTA,conjugated to biomolecules of varying sizes, RGD and BSA, with twodifferent radiometals, ⁶⁴Cu²⁺ and ⁶⁸Ga³⁺, demonstrating the versatilityof the system for labeling. The materials from which the microreactor ismade withstood substantial doses of radiation (260 mCi), and interactedminimally with the radiometal, once the negatively-charged glass surfaceof the microreactor is blocked with positively-charged ions (˜5%retention of injected activity). Furthermore, from a comparison betweenthe radiolabeling yields of the microreactor and of two conventionalradiolabeling methods at various temperatures, the inventors concludedthat the higher radiolabeling yield observed for the microreactor wasachieved through efficient mixing with chaotic advection and throughenhanced heat transfer. Finally, it was demonstrated that, by usingsmall volumes of concentrated radiometal (˜50 μM), it is possible toachieve high radiolabeling yields (>90%) without resorting to using anexcess of BFC-BM to accelerate the rate of reaction, as is necessary inmacro-scale, conventional radiolabeling procedures that require dilutionof the radiometal. High yields with a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio ofradiometal to BFC-BM eliminate the need for chromatographic purificationof the product to remove unlabeled BFC-BMs, resulting in shortersynthesis times and therefore a higher specific activity of theresulting imaging or therapeutic agent. The results described heresuggest that this microreactor-based approach has great potential forimproving the preparation of radiopharmaceuticals in the clinic.

The chelation conditions may be further optimized for radiolabeling withother radiometals, such as ^(99m)Tc, and to integrate pre-concentrationand purification elements in the microreactor to ensure that highradiolabeling yields are obtained reproducibly, and that the radiometalsolution is sufficiently pure and concentrated for the eventual clinicalapplication of the resulting radiopharmaceuticals in humans.Furthermore, a complementary microreactor may be developed for theconjugation of bifunctional chelators to disease-specific biomolecules.Such a system would provide great versatility for the production ofpatient-tailored doses of imaging and therapeutic agents for nuclearmedicine.

In summary, benefits of the technology include:

Efficient, passive mixing using staggered herringbone grooves and fastheat transfer across the small height of the microreactor improvereaction yields over those obtained by conventional synthesis methods;

Ability to handle a range of meso-scale volumes (1 to 50 microliters)provides the following advantages: (a) negates requirement for dilutionof the radiometal, allowing high reaction rates to be attained at a 1:1stoichiometric ratio of radio metal to ligand, which in turn negates therequirement for subsequent chromatographic purification steps; (b)allows for the production of clinically relevant quantities of imagingagents with low solubility in aqueous media, such as those incorporatingantibodies;

Conjugation of BFC to BM and chelation of radio metals by BFC-BMconjugate (radiolabeling) is performed in aqueous media atnear-physiological temperature and neutral pH, which allows targetingmolecules such as antibodies to be labeled, since no solvents that woulddenature the biomolecule are required, in contrast to radiolabeling withnon-metallic radionuclides, such as ¹⁸F and ¹¹C;

Versatility of the system to label different radiolabeled complexes; and

Automated operation, the simplicity of microreactor design and itsmodular nature, the low cost of materials, fabrication, and ancillaryequipment, and the reduced size and shielding requirements, incomparison to currently available automated synthesis modules, allcontribute toward minimizing costs. The lowered cost is especiallyuseful in a clinical environment where disposability is a key desiredfeature.

Altogether, these benefits may allow for the point-of-care synthesis ofcustom-designed PET/SPECT imaging agents in the clinic.

6 Microfluidic Conjugation of Bi-Functional Chelators to Biomolecules

Microfluidic technologies may have application to the synthesis ofchemicals, from simple one-step processes to complex multi-stepprocesses. Click chemistry is emerging as a powerful tool for theconjugation of various functional molecules, including bi-functionalchelators, to biomolecules. Using a microfluidic platform to perform theclick chemistry-based synthesis of multimodal imaging agents may provideadditional benefits, such as versatility (through the ability to attacha variety of chelators to targeting biomolecules), low consumption ofpotentially expensive and hard-to-obtain reagents, faster synthesistimes, and better synthetic reproducibility through automation. Thistechnology has the following beneficial features:

Integration of conjugation chemistries on the same platform using aclick chemistry-based approach;

Ability to handle small volumes of reagents (as low as 1 μL), which mayavoid the need for dilution of the reagents for the conjugationreaction, and subsequently lead to high conjugation reaction rates for a1:1 stoichiometry;

Precise control over reagent volumes and concentrations, which mayensure that the reagents are combined in the desired stoichiometricratios, and hence, avoid the purification steps typically required whenone of the reagents is used in excess;

Integration of heating and incubation on the same microfluidic platform,which may result in reduced loss of reagents during transfer betweendifferent processes, faster rates of heat transfer, and smaller overallsystem size;

Ability to perform conjugation reactions using aqueous chemistries,which is preferred over labeling in organic solvents for biomoleculessuch as antibodies and other proteins;

A re-useable, surface-immobilized Cu¹⁺ catalyst for clickchemistries—the high surface area to volume ratio of microchannels maybe a benefit for the heterogeneous catalysis of conjugation reactions;and

High degree of automation.

The click reaction relied on exclusively for performing the conjugationof BFCs to BMs is shown in FIG. 13: the copper (I)-catalyzedazide-alkyne [3+2] cycloaddition reaction. The order and choice of thereaction scheme and reaction conditions for this scheme may be optimizedto result in shorter synthesis time, higher reaction yield, and higherpurity.

An illustration of the various microreactor designs used to conjugateBFCs to biomolecules is shown in FIG. 14. The microreactor may be builtfrom PDMS and glass, as before, and may include a set of microchannelswith dimensions to the microchannels of the radiolabeling microreactor.Each of the microchannels may contain staggered herringbone grooves togenerate chaotic advection; this advection may assist in transportingthe BM and BFC reagents to a Cu(I) catalyst immobilized on themicrochannel surfaces.

The microreactor has been used to perform a click-reaction using copper(I) as a catalyst. A protocol has been developed for immobilizing copper(I) on glass surfaces, and the protocol has been used for immobilizingcopper (I) on microreactor channel walls.

6.1.1. On-Chip Via Copper (I)-Assisted Click Chemistry

The inventors have hypothesized that efficient mixing and enhanced heattransfer in microchannel will lead to higher reaction efficiencies inthe microreactor.

Method:

A microreactor design that is identical to the one used for previouslyreported radiolabeling experiments was employed in the followingexperiments. A Flu-568 azide (100 μM) was mixed with Propargylamine (100μM), and the azide-alkyne mixture was reacted with copper (I) as acatalyst. The copper (I) was synthesized by in situ reduction of coppersulfate (1 mM) with sodium ascorbate (10 mM). The solution was mixed inthe serpentine herringbone channel network of the microreactor andincubated in the reservoirs at 37° C. for different residence times. Theclick product was analyzed using fluorescence.

Results and Discussion

The comparison of click reaction efficiencies as a function of residencetime obtained using the microreactor and conventional procedures areshown in FIG. 15. The higher efficiencies were achieved using themicroreactor due to the more effective mixing of small volumes, andenhanced heat transfer.

6.2. Protocol for Immobilizing Copper (I) on Glass

Although the efficiencies of the click reactions were high in themicroreactor (˜80%), even higher values can be achieved by immobilizingthe catalyst (copper (I)) on the channel walls. Since thesurface-to-volume ratio is higher at the microscale, more of the solutemolecules will be in contact with the catalyst, thus enhancing thereaction efficiencies. Additionally, the use of immobilized catalystavoids the need for removing the catalyst from the click product.

Method:

An exemplary procedure for immobilizing copper (I) on glass is asfollows:

Clean the Glass Surface:

Corning glass microscope slides were sonicated for 10 minutes in 250 mLof 95% acetone & 5% Milli-Q H₂O. Then, the slides were sonicated for 5minutes in 250 mL Milli-Q H2O, and these two steps were repeated twice.Finally, the slides were air-dried in a purifier vertical clean bench.

Attach Silane Acrylate to the Glass:

To each slide, 2 silicon isolators were attached (Grace Bio-labs;JTR2OR-2.0; 20 mm dia.×2 mm depth), forming 2 wells on the glass slide.Then, TMSPA (3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl acrylate, Aldrich cat#475149) wasattached to the glass surface. After filling the wells with TMSPA, theywere incubated for 1 hour at 37° C., and then washed thoroughly withacetone.

Attach Copper (I) Stabilizing Molecule to Silane:

Since copper (I) has the tendency to oxidize readily to copper (II),tris[(1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl]amine or TBTA was used tostabilize copper (I). To each well, 10 mM TBTA derivative dissolved inmethanol was added, and then the silane attachment was initiated byadding 30 μL Borax aqueous solution. The reaction mixture was incubatedovernight at room temperature in the purifier vertical clean bench.Then, the wells were washed thoroughly with acetone and Milli-Q H₂O.

Immobilize Copper (I):

200 μL Cu(I) stock solution (prepared by mixing 0.9 mL 100 mM sodiumascorbate with 3.6 mL 10 mM CuSO4), was added to the pre-treated wells,and then shaken for 30 minutes at room temperature. Finally, the wellswere washed thoroughly with Milli-Q H₂O.

Since copper-64 was used, the amount of immobilized copper wasquantified by measuring the radiation count. For control, copper (I) wasalso immobilized on non-treated glass surfaces.

Results and Discussion

The amount of copper (I) immobilized per unit area was observed to be267 μmoles/m².

6.3. Protocol for Immobilizing Copper (I) on Channel Walls of theMicroreactor

The above protocol was adapted to immobilize copper (I) in intactmicrofluidic channels.

Method:

An exemplary protocol for immobilizing copper (I) on microchannel wallsis as follows:

Flush the microchannels with isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and remove anybubbles present.

Fill the channels with H₂O:H₂O₂:HCl (5:1:1) solution at 10 μL/min, andlet the solution sit in the channels for 10 minutes, Flush the channelswith water to remove any trace of solution in previous step and then N₂gas to completely dry out the microchannels.

Flow TMSPA (silane) and let it sit in the channel for 30 minutes, roomtemperature. After filling in the silane, remove the outlet tubing, andcompletely cover the device with crystal clear tape.

Flush the channels with isopropyl alcohol, then with N₂.

Prepare stock solution of 10 mM PEG-TBTA in 5% (by volume) Boraxsolution in water. Mix small amount of PEG-TBTA with Borax at 10:1volumetric ratio. Use approximately 300 μL of the PEG-TBTA solution and30 μL of Borax. Flow the solution through the channels and let it sitfor at least 24 hours. To minimize water evaporation, either cover thedevice completely with crystal clear tape or place the device in analmost 100% relative humidity environment.

Flush the channels with IPA+water.

Mix 0.9 mL 100 mM sodium ascorbate with 3.6 mL 1 mM copper sulfate. Flowthis solution through the channels and let it sit for 30 minutes.

Flush with water, and then blow out the water with nitrogen.

Results and Discussion

The amount of copper (I) immobilized per unit area was observed to be43-52 μmoles/m², which is approximately 5 times lower than that observedfor conventional immobilization protocols. The inventors speculate thatthe interaction of the reagent molecules with the channel walls,especially due to extended exposure under no flow, results in lowerimmobilization efficiencies. These issues may be addressed by modifyingthe above protocol to continuously stir the reagent solutions during thevarious immobilization steps, or use a different material for thechannel walls.

Although the present invention has been described in considerable detailwith reference to certain embodiments thereof, other embodiments arepossible without departing from the present invention. The spirit andscope of the appended claims should not be limited, therefore, to thedescription of the preferred embodiments included here. All embodimentsthat come within the meaning of the claims, either literally or byequivalence, are intended to be embraced therein. Furthermore, theadvantages described above are not necessarily the only advantages ofthe invention, and it is not necessarily expected that all of thedescribed advantages will be achieved with every embodiment of theinvention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A microreactor for preparing a radiolabeledcomplex or a biomolecule conjugate, the microreactor comprising: amicrochannel for fluid flow, the microchannel including an upstreammixing portion and a downstream mixing portion each comprising one ormore passive mixing elements; a first inlet upstream of the upstreammixing portion for introduction of a first reagent; a second inletupstream of the upstream mixing portion for introduction of a secondreagent; a third inlet between the upstream mixing portion and thedownstream mixing portion for introduction of a third reagent; and atleast one reservoir for incubating a mixed fluid, the at least onereservoir being in fluid communication with the microchannel anddisposed downstream of the downstream mixing portion.
 2. Themicroreactor of claim 1, wherein the upstream mixing portion is in afirst straight portion of the microchannel and the downstream mixingportion is in a second straight portion of the microchannel, the firstand second straight portions being connected.
 3. The microreactor ofclaim 2, wherein the microchannel defines a serpentine flow path, thesecond straight portion being arranged substantially parallel to thefirst straight portion.
 4. The microreactor of claim 1, wherein the oneor more passive mixing elements comprise a series of grooves in a wallof the microchannel.
 5. The microreactor of claim 4, wherein the seriesof grooves define a staggered herringbone pattern.
 6. The microreactorof claim 1, wherein the upstream and downstream mixing portions eachcomprise a length of between about 0.1 cm and about 100 cm.
 7. Themicroreactor of claim 1, wherein the microchannel comprises a height ofbetween about 5 microns and about 500 microns.
 8. The microreactor ofclaim 1, wherein the microchannel comprises a width of between about 5microns and about 500 microns.
 9. The microreactor of claim 1, whereinthe reservoir has an elongated shape in a direction of the fluid flow.10. The microreactor of claim 9, wherein a longitudinal cross-section ofthe elongated shape is a hexagon.
 11. The microreactor of claim 1,wherein the reservoir comprises a tapered entrance region connected to awider central region, the wider central region comprising a width atleast about an order of magnitude greater than a width of themicrochannel.
 12. The microreactor of claim 1, further comprising aplurality of the reservoirs.
 13. The microreactor of claim 12, whereinthe plurality of the reservoirs are arranged in series.
 14. Themicroreactor of claim 12, wherein the plurality of the reservoirs arearranged in parallel.
 15. The microreactor of claim 12, wherein theplurality of the reservoirs comprise a total of volume of between about5 μL and about 1000 μL.
 16. The microreactor of claim 1, comprisingpolydimethylsiloxane (PDMS).
 17. The microreactor of claim 16, whereinthe PDMS is bonded to glass, a ceiling of the microchannel comprisingthe PDMS and a floor of the microchannel comprising the glass.
 18. Themicroreactor of claim 17, further comprising a thin-film heater incontact with the glass.